SECTION 09 OF 12 / Make the buying decision

Scorecard

Score three supplier plans against the same evidence and launch gates.

16PAGES
27SOURCES CITED
27 October 2026LAST UPDATED
Heating controls and copper pipework in a plant room
WORKING TOOL / 100-POINT SCORECARD

Compare the plan.
Keep the evidence beside it.

Score the supplier plus the proposed workflow. No named supplier has been rated. Gates override every total.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
01 · Incremental business value and workflow fit 18%02 · Safety, escalation and decision boundaries 16%03 · Integration and booking integrity 15%04 · Privacy, security and data governance 12%05 · Reliability, fallback and support 10%06 · Measurement and pilot design 9%07 · Full-year cost and commercial clarity 7%08 · Staff usability and customer experience 5%09 · Ownership, portability and exit 5%10 · Delivery competence and accountability 3%
Assessment criterionWeight
Launch gates · every applicable gate must pass
G1. Safety and authority

Competent review of emergency handling; approved scripts; explicit limits on diagnosis, prices and technical commitments

Stop condition: The system invents safety advice, delays the approved emergency route or makes an unauthorised commitment

Gate
G2. Booking and record integrity

Demonstrated permissions, customer/site matching, availability validation and duplicate prevention appropriate to the permitted actions

Stop condition: The system confirms an appointment it has not successfully recorded, changes the wrong record or bypasses booking restrictions

Gate
G3. Personal-data governance

Documented purposes and lawful bases; processing-role assessment; appropriate contracts; data-flow map; retention rules; DPIA decision and transfer assessment

Stop condition: Real data would enter an unexplained processor, unauthorised training process or unresolved high-risk processing arrangement

Gate
G4. Human control and continuity

Working diversion or shutdown control; named exception owner; tested failure routes; clear customer messaging when humans are unavailable

Stop condition: Customers become trapped in the AI interaction, failures go unnoticed or staff cannot stop the workflow

Gate
G5. Spend and exit control

Written charges, usage limits, alerts and fallback behaviour; access and export arrangements; a bounded pilot commitment

Stop condition: Uncapped exposure, undisclosed material charges or no workable route to recover operations and records

Gate
G6. Outbound communications

Approved purpose, audience, channel, permission rules and suppression logic for each message sequence

Stop condition: The supplier treats an inbound enquiry as unrestricted permission for future marketing

Gate
Weighted criteria · unknown remains visible
18
16
15
12
10
9
7
5
5
3

A canned demo cannot earn more than 2 for operational performance. A sandbox test alone cannot earn more than 3 for live reliability or economic results. A material control failure also fails its gate and caps the affected row at 1 until remediation and retesting.

Option 1
0.0/ 100
060 · pilot80 · expansion review

Below 60 · 10 criteria unknown

Evidence references: 0 / 10 criteria.

No live use: gate evidence remains unresolved.

Unresolved gates: G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6.

Option 2
0.0/ 100
060 · pilot80 · expansion review

Below 60 · 10 criteria unknown

Evidence references: 0 / 10 criteria.

No live use: gate evidence remains unresolved.

Unresolved gates: G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6.

Option 3
0.0/ 100
060 · pilot80 · expansion review

Below 60 · 10 criteria unknown

Evidence references: 0 / 10 criteria.

No live use: gate evidence remains unresolved.

Unresolved gates: G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6.

Saved on this device.

Weights and thresholds are editorial purchasing controls, not industry benchmarks or certification. Keep unknown evidence visible. Read the decision rules →

Read the full research

Inside this section.

16 pages
01

How should a heating or air-conditioning company judge an AI agency or automation proposal?

Choose the supplier that can demonstrate a controlled improvement in your business—not the most convincing conversation with a chatbot.

Read →
02

What exactly are you scoring?

Score the supplier-plus-plan, not the supplier’s brand.

Read →
03

Why must the comparison include existing software and human answering?

Do not commission an agency until it has explained what your existing platform cannot do.

Read →
04

Which failures should block a live pilot?

A failed or unresolved gate means no live customer traffic or personal-data processing within the affected scope.

Read →
05

How does the 100-point score work?

Rate each criterion from 0 to 5, then multiply by its weight divided by five.

Read →
06

What should good and bad look like for each criterion?

Business value, safety, integration and data governance carry 61 of the 100 points.

Read →
07

What evidence should an AI agency provide?

Request evidence that can be checked against your systems and operating rules.

Read →
08

What must the privacy and security review actually check?

Review the complete processing arrangement, not a compliance badge.

Read →
09

When does quotation follow-up or a maintenance reminder become marketing?

Classify the actual message and audience before enabling the sequence.

Read →
10

Which stress tests should an HVAC AI receptionist pass?

Test operational behaviour, not just whether the voice sounds natural.

Read →
11

How should the pilot prove an operational improvement?

Use buyer-owned records and a comparison that preserves normal customer service.

Read →
12

How should you calculate full-year cost and break-even?

Build the calculation from your enquiry funnel and job contribution, not a generic missed-call revenue claim.

Read →
13

What should the contract and handover protect?

Negotiate the ability to operate, verify and leave—not just the right to cancel a subscription.

Read →
14

How should the final score change the purchasing decision?

Use stage-specific decisions rather than a single “approved supplier” label.

Read →
Research quality & limitations

Editorial self-assessment from the research pack; these are not independent ratings or verified outcomes.

9/10buyer fit9/10depth9/10search terms8/10sources
Read the evidence and limits →